Hypothesis Tests Suggested Problems
1. A machine that produces ball bearings is
set so that the average diameter is .50 inch. In a sample of 100 ball bearings,
it was found that x-bar = .51 inch. Assuming that the standard deviation is .05
inch, can we conclude at the 5% significance level
that the mean diameter is not .50 inch? (Keller 5th Ed. 10.33 p.333)
2. Past experience indicates that the
monthly long-distance telephone bill is normally distributed with a mean of
$17.85 and a standard deviation of $3.87. After an advertising campaign aimed
at increasing long-distance telephone usage, a random sample of 25 household
bills was taken. The results are listed in file (Data). (Keller 5th Ed. 10.41 p.333)
a) Do the data allow us to infer at the 10%
significance level that the campaign was successful?
b) What assumption must you make to answer
part (a)?
3. A school-board administrator believes
that the average number of days absent per year among students is less than 10
days. From past experience, he knows that the population standard deviation is
3 days. In testing to determine whether his belief is true, he could use either
of the following plans. (Keller 5th Ed. 10.57 p.342)
Which plan has the lower probability of type
II error, given that the true population average is 9 days.
Why?
4. A diet doctor claims that the average
North American is more than 20 pounds overweight. To test his claim, a random sample of 100 North Americans were weighed, and the
difference between their actual weight and their ideal weight was calculated.
The data are stored in file Data. Do these data allow us to infer at the 5%
significance level that the doctor's claim is true? (Keller 5th Ed. 11.32
p.363)
5. One important factory in inventory
control is the variance of the daily demand for the product. An industrial
engineer has developed the optimal order quantity and reorder point, assuming
that the variance is equal to 250. Recently, the company has experienced some
inventory problems, which induced the operations manager to doubt the
assumption. To examine the problem, the manager took a sample of 25 daily
demands recorded in file Data . Do these data provide sufficient evidence at the
5% significance level to infer that the Industrial Engineer's assumption about
the variance is wrong? (Keller 5th Ed. 11.46 p.373)
6. The
Right track (1)
Wrong track (2)
No opinion (0)
The responses are stored in the frequency
distribution below:
0 = 50
1 = 365
2 = 197
Estimate with 99% confidence the proportion
of all Georgians who had an opinion and that opinion that things have gotten
off on the wrong track. (Keller 11.30 p.409)
7. Barnes 9.11
8. Barnes 9.12
9. Barnes 9.19
10. Barnes 9.25
Hypothesis Tests Suggested Problems Solutions
1. (Keller 5th Ed. 10.33 p.333)
.50
.50
=
= 2.00, p-value = 2P(z > 2.00) = .0456
Rejection region: z >
or z < ![]()
Conclusion: Reject the null
hypothesis. There is enough evidence to infer that the population
mean diameter s not equal to .50.
2. (Keller 5th Ed. 10.41 p.333)
a
17.85
17.85
=
= 1.66, p-value = P(z > 1.66) = .0485
Rejection region: z >
Conclusion: Reject the null
hypothesis. There is enough evidence to infer that the campaign was successful.
Excel Printout
|
Test of Hypothesis
About MU (SIGMA Known) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test of MU =
17.85 Vs MU greater than 17.85 |
||||
|
SIGMA = 3.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sample mean =
19.1316 |
|
|
||
|
Test
Statistic: z = 1.6558 |
|
|
||
|
P-Value = 0.0489 |
|
|
|
|
b The standard deviation after the campaign is assumed
to be the same as before the campaign. That is,
= 3.85.
3. (Keller 5th Ed. 10.57 p.342)
10.57 i Rejection region:
< ![]()
< ![]()
<
9.30
= P(
> 9.30 given
= 9) =
= P(z > 1) = .1587
Excel Printout
|
Probability of a Type II error |
|
|
|
Left-tail Test |
|
H0: MU |
10 |
|
SIGMA |
3 |
|
Sample size |
100 |
|
ALPHA |
0.01 |
|
H1: MU |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Critical value(s) |
9.30 |
|
Prob(Type II error) |
0.1570 |
i i Rejection region:
< ![]()
< ![]()
<
9.43
= P(
> 9.43 given
= 9) =
= P(z > 1.24) = .1075
Excel Printout
|
Probability of a Type II error |
|
|
|
Left-tail Test |
|
H0: MU |
10 |
|
SIGMA |
3 |
|
Sample size |
75 |
|
ALPHA |
0.05 |
|
H1: MU |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Critical value(s) |
9.43 |
|
Prob(Type II error) |
0.1071 |
iii Rejection region:
< ![]()
< ![]()
<
9.46
= P(
> 9.46 given
= 9) =
= P(z > 1.08) = .1401
Excel Printout
|
Probability of a Type II error |
|
|
|
Left-tail Test |
|
H0: MU |
10 |
|
SIGMA |
3 |
|
Sample size |
50 |
|
ALPHA |
0.1 |
|
H1: MU |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Critical value(s) |
9.46 |
|
Prob(Type II error) |
0.1411 |
4. (Keller 5th Ed. 11.32 p.363)
= 20
> 20
=
= 3.12
Rejection region: t >
= ![]()
1.660
Conclusion: Reject the null
hypothesis. There is enough evidence to infer that the doctor's claim is true.
Excel Printout
|
Test of Hypothesis
About MU (SIGMA Unknown) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test of MU =
20 Vs
MU greater than 20 |
|
|||
|
Sample standard
deviation = 13.4222 |
|
|||
|
Sample mean =
24.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Test
Statistic: t = 3.1217 |
|
|
||
|
P-Value = 0.0012 |
|
|
|
|
5. (Keller 5th Ed. 11.46 p.373)
= 250
![]()
250
=
= 25.98, p-value (Excel) = .7088
Rejection region:
= 39.3641 or
=
= 12.4011
Conclusion: Do not reject
the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to infer that the
variance is not equal to 250.
Excel Printout
|
Chi-squared Test
of a Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Sample variance |
270.58 |
|
Sample size |
25 |
|
|
|
|
Hypothesized
variance |
250 |
|
|
|
|
Chi-squared Stat |
25.98 |
|
Two-tail p-value |
0.7088 |